Talk:North Greenwich tube station

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit / in UK / in London Low‑importance

	Trains Portal

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as Low-importance).

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no move. — Mets501 (talk) 19:56, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

North Greenwich tube station → North Greenwich transport interchange – reason for move not stated.

Survey[edit]

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Oppose. For example, Canada Water has an interchange with a bus station but it is its own station, Turnpike Lane has, there are many other examples which come to mind. Therefore I say leave as is. Simply south 21:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

However, this article deals with the bus stop too, which I do not believe merits its own article. In books about the Dome it is referred to as the North Greenwich Transport Interchange. — G a ry Kirk // ^talk! 08:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I was going to make the same point on Canada Water tube station --Henrygb 20:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Relisting for lack of consensus. --Dijxtra 18:56, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There seems no lack of consensus. The reasons were given in Requested moves as follows:

: This is what the interchange is, not merely a tube station - there is also a bus station, which the article discusses. — G a ry Kirk // ^talk! 14:31, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting. --Dijxtra 18:57, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rough consensus seems to me to be leave. This debate can be closed by anyone, it doesn't need admin action. (But please try to follow the correct procedures.) Andrewa 21:00, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Plenty of trains terminate at North Greenwich during peak hours - something like one in four. Westbound trains starting at North Greenwich leave from Platform 2, and do not serve the same platform as those trains that arrive from Canning Town. WillE 13:22, 3 November 2006 (UTC) (A daily commuter on the line!)[reply]

I've been bold, and included the above in the article. WillE at Work 164.36.142.217 13:30, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]