Talk:Uri Party

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled[edit]

As with the GNP, the content reads like a media-centric generalization of political parties in Korea. Definately needs better structuring and additional information. And those who like to edit the article, please do so after registering. Showing just an ip really hurts your credibility.

--Steviecnd 21:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer to see this page moved to Uri Party. Most English-language media refers to the party as such. Are there any reasons for keeping the page here? --Iceager 00:44, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I was thinking the same thing. -- Visviva 01:47, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I agree Electionworld 06:34, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I've done the page move. Talrias (t | e | c) 11:09, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was not my inadvertence to delete a paragraph related to Chinese Communist Party. The paragraph seems just out of context, not in any way worth describing. noirum June 28, 2005 08:39 (UTC)

In what sense is it not worth describing? You don't think that an agreement between Uri and the CCP (which is the main sponsor of the KWP is in any way significant? --Ce garcon 19:00, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Reword[edit]

I took this last paragraph out:

"...while neglecting to devote any attention to the numerous transgressions by North Korea, such as the failure to cooperate with the six party talks, manufacture of counterfeit U.S. dollars, illicit sales of arms to terrorist countries, and border provocations in the demilitarized zone."

While there could be some truth to that statement, until it is sourced and verifiable, and less POV, I don't think it's worth keeping.Paj.meister 22:44, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with the UNDP[edit]

Although truly difficult in mind, personally, someone should mention about this recent political chaos(changes) in South Korea. I did it(briefly). Does anyone who help to fill more? Peterhansen2032 08:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Uri Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]