Talk:Members of the 38th Canadian Parliament and same-sex marriage

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Comment from 209.217.75.172[edit]

NOTE:The new layout in the Liberal backbench/cabinet looks nicer - however, what was once a substantive amount of info for many MP's is now simply one or two lines. Therefore, please copy/paste the same "notes/comments" for the MP...don't try to summarize it shorter. I know info like this probably shouldn't be written on this page, but only the Liberal Backbench and Cabinet have been changed -- in a way I think it's unfair to those (such as myself) who have done tremendous work watching debates and summarizing and updating MP's position. This is an e-encyclopedia, keep the 'new look', but people should know in more detail why a member voted a particular way. Thank you. -- Originally posted to the article by 209.217.75.172 (talk · contribs) at 07:17, 29 June 2005 UTC

Should this article even be here?[edit]

This article seems very long, and very dated. Perhaps this should have been on Wikinews instead? The raw facts, on who voted which way perhaps should be somewhere; but all the comments on each MP? Where are the references for these? Should the entire article be deleted with the vote-totals added to the Civil Marriage Act? The last deletion discussion while this bill was still in progress, discussed how a lot of the comments, speculation, etc. would likely be removed after the vote was over. Definitly time for a clean-up at least! Nfitz 01:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A clean-up sounds reasonable, but I don't see a need to ditch the article just because the C-38 debate is over. If the issue is revisited in the future, this could be a useful resource. CJCurrie 02:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is rainbow Canada flag better?[edit]

On April 11, 2006, NTK replaced the Canadian flag in this template with a rainbow version of the Canadian flag.

Since this is only one of the articles affected, please give your comments at this central location: Template talk:GR-C Wuzzy 03:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clarity and Colour[edit]

The article (and the one about the 39th house) is really confusing the way it is. Also, the Manual of style highly discourage the usage of colours, especially if its the only way to identify something. --Deenoe 22:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tonks source?[edit]

What is the news source that says that Tonks's personal beliefs are against gay marriage?--Sonjaaa (talk) 16:21, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Members of the 38th Canadian Parliament and same-sex marriage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]