Talk:Books of Blood

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Short story task force.

Horror Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I've started adding plot outlines for these stories. They are not perfect because, although I have read them all, I have not read some of them in ages. I'm flicking through these ones again to refresh my memory. Also, some stories have incidents, characters and conclusions that are ambigious and open to interpretation; I've tried to point this out where appropriate but there will probably (hopefully!) be people who will correct or expand on anything I have gotten wrong or dealt with too briefly. Robert Mercer 12:45, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Edited the entry for "New Murders in the Rue Morgue", fixed the character name of Phillipe from Eugene (Eugene is a character in "Skins of the Father").

Searching this article[edit]

Does anyone know why when you search for "books of blood" it doesn't immediately find this article? In fact, the disambiguous redirect page "the books of blood" comes up with a higher relevence. I'm confused. How do I fix that? Viscouse 19:08, August 16, 2005 (UTC)

Fixed! --InShaneee 23:59, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A thought[edit]

I think that this page should be divvied up into several pages: one for the series itself (and the general background info, etc), and one (each) for the books (and short stories) themselves. I feel that that would make it more wiki-friendly (as it's very long and unwieldy right now). Someone (/I) could even put together a template for the bottom of the books' pages (for an example of what I mean, see {{Everything'sEventual}}. So.. thoughts? -Elizabennet | talk 23:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Twilight at the Towers[edit]

This story, though published, has never actually been read by human beings. Its existence has remained Clive Barker's greatest mystery. ICEBreaker (talk) 15:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Books of Blood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080203105858/http://www.clivebarker.info:80/newfilmse.html to http://www.clivebarker.info/newfilmse.html#bob

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]