Talk:Scholz conjecture

[Untitled][edit]

It would be nice if we could get this all into one language or all into another.

The Addition chain article states, that the conjecture has been verified for n<=64, this one says n<=46, which one is correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.69.167.73 (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

Unless there is a lot more to say here, I propose to merge this into Addition chain. Deltahedron (talk) 19:16, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed proof[edit]

I stumbled recently on a paper claiming a proof of the conjecture https://ia.cr/2023/051 What is the general opinion on this, because I have not found any flaw although the ideas are hard to parse?

(Sadinova (talk) 20:16, 31 March 2023 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Prof. Agama, I think this sort of unseemly self-promotion is below you. Please also review David Eppstein's comment here. --JBL (talk) 00:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

...and see also WP:DISCLOSE. - CRGreathouse (t | c) 20:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]