Talk:Trevi Fountain

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trevi Fountain article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 28 days

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sculpture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles

Visual arts: Public art

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
	This article is supported by the public art task force.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 22, 2018 and May 22, 2022.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Added image[edit]

A thank you to shy Wikipedian User:Wng. Wng's image gives sense to the words of the description, and this entry gells at last! Wetman 18:15, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Papal families[edit]

A recent editor, offended the the Holy Fathers' family names were mentioned, suppressed them. I have returned them. In the areas of artistic patronage and of Renaissance and Baroque princely politics, the family alliance of a pope is very often relevant. If Lorenzo II de' Medici was made Duke of Urbino, it is useful to know that the Medici Pope Leo X made the gift; Bernini's Barberini patron is a Barberini pope. This is common practice in the literature, and it aids the reader. With modern popes, of course, all this would be irrelevant. Wetman 20:54, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)

That Pope Urban VIII was a Barberini is of course significant. It is not significant in the context of this article, which does not discuss who the Barberini are, or what is their significance. That Nicholas V was a Parentucelli, and Clement XII a Corsini, is, so far as I am aware, utterly insignificant. If you'd like to have "Pope Urban VIII (formerly Cardinal Barberini)," I would be fine with that, although I don't see why it matters in the context of this article. john k 23:42, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC) hi

eponymous[edit]

This is the most misused word in Wikipedia. It seems to be sprinkled in to add a bit of intellectual gravitas to articles. What is eponymous about "three coins in the fountain". Backep1 (talk) 07:17, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

relevance of 2023 attack[edit]

the fountain has been a target of previous activism vandalism. what about the 2023 attack is noteworthy enough to warrant its own section? 2600:4040:90BC:3500:D025:2DE9:787C:1AD0 (talk) 18:58, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no “modern history” section, so that is the only relevant part of the modern history for the fountain. That is the only reason it has its own section. Plus it made international news. Elijahandskip (talk) 19:12, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]