Talk:Veni, vidi, vici

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 20 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

Moving this page[edit]

Shouldn't this page be on Veni, Vidi, Vici, with uppercase V's? I've searched a bit, and everywhere I found anything about it that was not a forum or anything, it was with uppercase V's. Even the first 3 words of the article are with uppercase V's.User:? (talk) 20:21, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's a reasonable comment. Feel free to request a move if you feel strongly about it! --Slasher (talk) 15:34, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the question of cases is irrelevant, since in Caesar's time there was no lower case, nor was there punctuation. Gaius Iulius would have written VENI VIDI VICI — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.169.129.252 (talk) 18:39, 9 July 2014 (UTC) π°1.33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333[reply]

Veni Vidi Vici is the coolest phrase ever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:d:1800:1a3d:21d:4fff:feff:480 (talk • contribs) 07:31, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Patent? Copyright? Trademark?[edit]

I removed the folowing sentense:

In 2012, the rights of using the phrase "Veni, Vidi, Vici" has been patented by the municipality of Zile in the northern province of Tokat.^[1]^[2]

The referenced article calls it eather a patent or a copyright. Either of which is nonsense - if anything it is a trademark, and that would not make that much sense either. So being nonsense, I removed it from the article. Thue (talk) 16:52, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A humorous variation on the speech was the caption of a cartoon where a young woman is shown coming home from a date and tells her roommate, "Vidi, vici, veni." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.169.129.252 (talk) 18:37, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a village in Turkey has no valid reason to patent it. I feel this is very reasonable. Kai2004 (talk) 05:06, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Hurriyet Daily News, (Source: Anatolia News Agency), 16 April 2012, Turkey, URL
^ Radikal, 14 April 2012, URL

Veni, vidi, agree[edit]

I came, I saw, I concur. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.55.189.193 (talk) 00:47, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Hurriyet Daily News, (Source: Anatolia News Agency), 16 April 2012, Turkey, URL

[2] Radikal, 14 April 2012, URL

[1]

[2]