Talk:Luxor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Doesn't the last part of this read like a travel brochure?

Not any more. –Hajor 21:38, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

If I am not mistaken, Luxor is not yet a governorate, but it most certainly will be in the future. I am not 100%, Can you verify this? As if for me, I quote from the Official Tourism Egypt government website,"Luxor today is a city of some 150,000 people and is governed by special statues that allow it more autonomy then other political areas of Egypt." It has a status that allows it to be like a governorate, but it still is part of the Qena governorate in Egypt. User:Hobapotter —Preceding comment was added at 00:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photo arrangement[edit]

Well, turns out I'm not very good at arranging photos. Someone please help me out. --Isewell 16:18, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Dunno. Looks OK to me. What didn't you like? –Hajor 21:38, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Looks better now. It looked cluttered before. Thanks. --Isewell 00:21, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Germanicus[edit]

Germanicus was not an emperor, he was adopted son of the emperor, and heir apparent; so more like a prince.

City of Palaces[edit]

Most websites I googled claim "Al-Uqsur" means "the city of palaces", obviously the "Al" stands for "the" and the romanization did not need the "L" in "Luxur", "uxur" was enough... Anyway, I cannot give an exact reliable reference for this, what shall be done? I had though the latin "luxus" which derived into "Luxury" and such words would be related but seemingly it comes from "luctari" which means "wrestle, strain." Nonetheless any historic cases of folk etymology follow this line of thought?Undead Herle King (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image arrangement.[edit]

Firefox isn't rendering this page correctly, the same can be said for Google Chrome.

Screen Shot --Sean Cansdale (talk) 18:22, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the images belong on linked pages such as Luxor Temple, Karnak, Luxor Museum, Felucca etc. The Ancient Thebes page has no images! So I am kicking most of them off except for some of the modern town.--Charles (talk) 19:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

changes needed[edit]

could do with some better maps, and maybe some maps of the city itself. Halowsmaster (talk) 20:45, 7 October 2009 (UTC) see also the talk page of the luxor mapHalowsmaster (talk) 20:51, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

The history section appears to stop in the Roman period. Especially given that we have a separate article on Thebes, shouldn't the history section at least give some information about the modern town? john k (talk) 14:55, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Luxor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Luxor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Luxor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Luxor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

History section[edit]

The "History" section is basically repeating the history of Waset/Thebes, for which we have an own article. It does not contain any information on Luxor itself. Has it always been there since anquitity? Was it founded much later on top of old ruins? What was its role before becoming a tourist center? Has it been a center of Upper Egypt in Christian and Muslim times or was it more like a fishing village? Even the Arabic article does not help much. Does anyone know sources to fill this gap? Thank you. --Magadan ?! 12:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

santa[edit]

hi santa 94.173.123.8 (talk) 20:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

Hi @A. Parrot: thanks for your thanks. I wondered if you might be interested in helping figure out the full story to the name question. I believe that a few hundred years ago this was viewed as two places with modern Arabic place names (Karnak Temple and Luxor Temple), the modern settlement grew around Luxor Temple so was called Luxor, early modern scholars identified the whole place (which then had no modern name) as Thebes from Greek literature, and the settlement around Luxor Temple grew to encompass the whole area so gave its name to the wider area.

This all seems logical but I don't have a source which states it like this so cannot add into the article. Onceinawhile (talk) 17:05, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's my impression as well, but I don't think I have a source that states it explicitly, and I'm not sure where to look. The article on Karnak has a citation for the name that links to an Arabic-language source, but English sources rarely say much about local Egyptian history in modern times. A. Parrot (talk) 17:18, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I will keep looking. 18th century sources seem to confirm it. An example is Claude-Étienne Savary (1787). Letters on Egypt: Containing, a Parallel Between the Manners of Its Ancient and Modern Inhabitants, Its Commerce, Agriculture, Government and Religion; with the Descent of Louis IX at Damietta. Extracted from Joinville, and Arabian Authors. G.G.J. and J. Robinson.
Onceinawhile (talk) 18:15, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Main photo - AI generated?[edit]

The article's main photo of Luxor Temple (by Mahmoud algazzar) looks very inauthentic and has some heavy artifacts, as if generated or upscaled by an AI (although the year of upload would suggest otherwise). Even if that isn't the case, perhaps a clearer image could be used as the main one instead? 2001:1AE9:262:4400:E1EF:B881:2543:80EE (talk) 22:59, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since it was uploaded in 2015, I doubt it. But it looks like a filter was applied. Hypnôs (talk) 11:09, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Luxor&oldid=1212106933"