Talk:Siege of Catubig

Military history: Asian / North America / Southeast Asia / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	North American military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force
	United States military history task force

Tambayan Philippines Mid‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

clean up[edit]

This article needs major clean up —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.35.146 (talk) 21:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC) It also needs a balancing POV: all is presented from American viewpoint at present, even after some removal of polemic tone. Kevin McE (talk) 18:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

incongruent information[edit]

If you click on the link to the 43rd Infantry Regiment, according to the Wikipedia page - that regiment did not exist until 1917. The page for the 43rd Infantry Regiment page was redirected from 43d Infantry Regiment (PS) with no explanation of what (PS) means.

Jtyroler (talk) 19:07, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]