User talk:Nomaed

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. You can learn more on the how to edit page. The naming conventions and style guide pages are also useful. There is a sandbox which you can use to experiment in.

If you have any questions, see the help pages or add a question to the village pump.

You can sign your name using three tildes (~~~) Using 4 will add the date. Angela 11:55, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Thank you Angela.
This info surely will help me, as a junion Wikipedian :)
Nomæd Dominus 01:15, 1 Sep 2003 (UTC)

February 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dela Yampulski, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dela Yampulski was changed by Nomaed (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-03T14:12:55+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:The Fading - Chaos in Flesh EP 2007.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:The Fading - Chaos in Flesh EP 2007.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:56, 9 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:56, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's great, thanks. As long as you're sure there's no issue with the image being released under that license (may be worth contacting the band, just to be sure). I've added to the image page a little to explain some of the things you mentioned on my talk page- thanks for clarifying this for me. J Milburn (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit of the Fading[edit]

Hey dude, I just changed it cuz it is like that on the band members section in the band's myspace, so I based the names on that.

--SlayerXT (talk), 10 July 2008

I see. Well, I wrote the names this way for a reason. Paul is the international name of Pavel, and Aranovič is the original writing of Aranovich, though the last one doesn't matter. I'll revert the Paul change.

Boris (Nomæd) A. (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, cool. Btw, how you did it that wikipedia would not delete the page? :O I created some pages for other Israeli bands (I created for The Fading as well before it got deleted) like They:Swarm, Phantom Pain and Immaterial, but only the Phantom Pain one is somehow still alive, others were deleted by Wikipedia. I think we just need to get more Israeli metal and punk bands into wikipedia :D

SlayerXT (talk), 10 July 2008

Well, thats what i did. When i first created the first page for The Fading, i also gave a bunch of information including the information about the Wacken Metal Battle including a link to the metal battle website and more links to rockdetector.com, myspace and such. And it was okay for like 5 days, then they sent me a message that they want to delete the page and all. it might happen to the current page you created too =/

SlayerXT (talk) 20:54, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Fading[edit]

Okay, sorry about that. It read that in some place but yeah it wasn't 100% and all, and then i saw no confirmation on the myspace but forgot to edit it again. Sorry. Btw, could you start pages for "Solitary" and "Matricide", they are also two cool and very known Israeli metal bands (at least in the israeli metal scene) but i keep writing pages for them and wikipedia keeps deleting them. ><

SlayerXT (talk) 18:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

We worked in the same company for a year and i didn't know that you write for Wikipedia or that you are interested in Linguistics.

Very strange.

I'm glad to see you here. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 14:41, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

True. It never came up ;) -Nomæd (Boris A.) (user, talk, contribs) 15:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I should have thought that Shlomo is not the only linguist there, when i saw that you spell your name with a č... --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 16:58, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shlomo is a linguist? Had no idea ;) -Nomæd (Boris A.) (user, talk, contribs) 17:10, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Civilians wounded[edit]

Can you please find the reference for the civilians wounded.[1] I have tried to find it but couldn't. If we can't find references, then we should remove it.VR _talk 16:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was already updated (although someone removed one dead solider, again...) -Nomæd (Boris A.) (user, talk, contribs) 22:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chart[edit]

I replied on the Wikipedia talk page for the chart:

File talk:Gaza-Israel war casualties.png

By the way, I noticed in the previous talk section here some discussion concerning casualty references. Check out the image summary on the chart page: File:Gaza-Israel war casualties.png . It links to the reference URLs for the numbers of dead and wounded. --Timeshifter (talk) 18:16, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks :)

About the previous discussion here, it was some minor reference removal issue. But I'll check your links too. -Nomæd (Boris A.) (user, talk, contribs) 06:32, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not insinuate that I am an anti-Semite[edit]

For I am not. Karldoh (talk) 10:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't make that hugh mistake[edit]

The overwhelming majority of the editors are obviously pro-palestinians, to say the least. We can't just leave the article to their mercy. Consider it as a part of the fight. You are letting them win by giving up on the article. I can hardly stand the burst of anti-Israeli incitement alone. Please re-consider.--Omrim (talk) 14:42, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chaos in Flesh[edit]

The categories should not have been included in the first place. Please see Wikipedia:ALBUM#Categories. J Milburn (talk) 22:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Errr, am I missing something? I saw that the musical genre is also supposed to be category... And more specifically: "For album articles, there are three "top-level" categories: Category:Albums by artist, Category:Albums by year and Category:Albums by genre." -Nomæd (Boris A.) (user, talk, contribs) 08:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah- read on. Only two of the top level categories go on the album page (year and artist). The other (genre) along with nationality, go on the artist category. Therefore, no albums, apart from compilation albums featuring many artists, should be placed directly in the genre categories. J Milburn (talk) 16:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, you're right. I shouldn't read Wiki policies right after waking up ;) -Nomæd (Boris A.) (user, talk, contribs) 07:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Israel football association new.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Israel football association new.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:06, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Fading - Chaos in Flesh EP 2007.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Fading - Chaos in Flesh EP 2007.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 22:40, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:The Fading 2012 band.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:The Fading 2012 band.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:08, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:WR TheFading 09.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:WR TheFading 09.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.4992289439.4297.542309439&l=f4915cf62e^{[dead link]}. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:09, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:The Fading 2012 band.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:The Fading 2012 band.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151238506673554&set=a.418296903553.206759.7500638553&type=1. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:21, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Fading New Line-Up 2012.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Fading New Line-Up 2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:50, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Nomaed. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Nomaed. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!