Talk:Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright problem[edit]

"To the poster: If there was permission to use this material under terms of our license or if you are the copyright holder of the externally linked text, then please indicate so on this page's talk page."


There is permission to use this material. Please contact nick@brothersinarms.nl.

Brothers_In_Arms/Temp[edit]

There seems to be a rewrite happening at Brothers_In_Arms/Temp pamri 05:02, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)

sorry. that seems to be the copy vio'ed article. pamri 05:04, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
What's the deal with Brothers_In_Arms/Temp, anyway? Shouldn't that article be removed, in favor of this one? Beanbatch 18:32, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The Temp link is now gone, redirected here. Beanbatch 22:32, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

release date[edit]

Is it March 15 or 16? Gamespot's really slow for me, so I can't check, but I know that the PS2 and PC versionsa re coming out on the same day, and it's one of those...? ugen64 06:35, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

15th. All games, DVDs, new media releases come out on Tuesday for some reason. It's rare when they come out on other days. K1Bond007 06:41, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)

split?[edit]

Should this article be split? The title is "Brothers In Arms: Road to Hill 30", but it also details the "Earned in Blood" sequel, as well as the third installment.

I agree, should be split, spent some time tonight trying to determine which articles should point to what as both versions are respresented here together. Note: There is a third version out in 2006, problem will only become more confusing

Unit[edit]

Isn't this game based on soldiers of the 502nd, not the 506th? The reason I haven't changed it already is because I'm not sure of this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scratt Wiesmann (talkcontribs)

You are correct. The game is based on the 502nd Infantry Regiment (United States). This is also consistent with the true-to-life character of Robert G. Cole in the game as an officer. --Scottie_theNerd 14:23, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

なぜ、シリーズ記事を作らないのですか?[edit]

どうも、初めまして。こちらの記事では大半、シリーズの記事がありますよね?これを唐突に言われても分からないので例を挙げます。例えば、このMedal of Honor (series)です。個人的には、Brothers in Armsも同様にシリーズをまとめた記事が作ってもらいたいのですが可能でしょうか?これは世界の人にも役に立つ事だと思うのですが、如何でしょうか?--60.42.167.204 (talk) 11:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

これは英語の Wikipedia です。私たちはわかるために英語で書いて下さい。 --Scottie_theNerd 15:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

Can anyone please add a reception section to this article? I could do it myself probably, but not being familiar with the standard format on Wikipedia for this kind of section (or with this particular game), I'd rather someone else did it. Thanks, Ynhockey (Talk) 20:16, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comic ?[edit]

Shouldn't we add a page for the comic ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.89.202 (talk) 00:14, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Play Station 2 Depresion[edit]

Again the PS2 disapoints us. Again a great game, Brothers In Arms Road to Hill 30, 

losses the race for graffics. The PS2 cuts out hundreds of lines that sometimes throughs you off, and the ammo thing is better on the PC and XBox than on the PS2.


Hi me again 3 years later i have had a 360 for 2 0f those years and i think if they remade this game i would go insane because of its already great story gameplay and ect.

Name Inspiration?[edit]

Hey, do you know if the name of this was inspired on music/album of Dire Straits? Khullah (talk) 13:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:39, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]