Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 April 28

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 28[edit]

category:Natives of the United Kingdom and category:Natives of England[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 18:30, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless and confusing. Created today, but as you might expect there are already thousands of people in category:English people and category:British people. Oliver Chettle 21:39, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Habsburg-Lothringen[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was rename --Kbdank71 18:11, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This category should be renamed to Category:Habsburg-Lorraine. Lothringen is the German name for Lorraine. Martg76 21:36, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Transitway stations and Category:O-Train stations[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 18:10, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

These were created by an anonymous user, and both have been amalgamated into Category:OC Transpo. --Spinboy 20:27, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Cities in Greece[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 18:55, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Everything here is already in the category Category:Cities in Greece. --Jtalledo (talk) 20:12, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Everything here is already in the category Category:Cities in Greece. --Jtalledo (talk) 20:12, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Everything here is already in the category Category:Cities and towns in Greece. SchmuckyTheCat 00:19, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Then, superfluous category. SchmuckyTheCat 00:19, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Kbdank71 14:09, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Doctor Who novels --> Category:Doctor Who books[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 14:30, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

self nom. Was created to deal with just novels and novelisation-related articles, but with the addition of a List of Doctor Who novellas by Telos, and to allow for possible expansion, it's probably better to rename to Category:Doctor Who books instead, with subcats to be created later when necessary. --khaosworks 18:07, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Can't we just delete this? There are four articles, only two of which actually have to do with Doctor Who. --Kbdank71 20:32, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Virgin Books and Virgin Publishing are linked indelibly to Doctor Who, as they were pretty much exclusively publishing Who-related stuff when they started, same as Target Books. I'm also intending to eventually create a subcat off this, Doctor Who book characters, with characters who appeared in the books (some which have crossed over into other areas, some haven't), and it would be a good spot to put it in. As the Who pages are expanding, more note is being paid to the print side - novels, novellas, short stories, non-fiction, et al., so that's why I'm proposing the rename. --khaosworks 20:46, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • rename as per suggestion so that it can then also catch any non fiction that someone may wish to write about --TimPope 12:40, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

category:RAAF bases[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 14:24, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

self nom. duplicate of category:Royal Australian Air Force bases. clarkk 10:30, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete KTC 13:34, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


Category:G4techTV[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was rename --Kbdank71 16:09, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This category needs to be renamed to G4 because the channel is no longer called G4techTV Salvag 06:08, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Rename, but to G4 Television or similar. --khaosworks 18:07, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Rename but NOT simply G4. RedWolf 02:00, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
  • Would anyone mind if I renamed it to "G4 (television)" to mirror the article? --Kbdank71 20:25, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Millionaires[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 14:19, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me like a very poor means of categorization. Oberiko 00:42, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. I could see having Category:Billionaires because that's a notable accomplishment. But being a millionaire these days is just too common and is also rarely reported on. Didn't we vote on this one once? It seems familiar. Postdlf 01:01, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete No longer a meaningful term. Oliver Chettle 04:03, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, far too common. K1Bond007 04:34, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete totally incomplete and will never be even close, too common and not meaningful. Salvag 17:48, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2005_April_28&oldid=1121873029"