Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Van Kolvenbach

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 12:58, May 1, 2005 (UTC)

Hans Van Kolvenbach

A looong magazine article, not an encyclopedia article. I don't know if the claims regarding copyright and use in the beginning are valid and make this a non-copyvio, but it seems doubtful that it would be compatible with GFDL in any case. - Uppland 18:38, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: not an encyclopedia article; probably incompatible license. --Carnildo 20:55, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, article as it stands is not encyclopaedic. Megan1967 01:46, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, copyvio, despite the disclaimer. Also not encyclopedic as it exists. RickK 21:54, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
  • Actually, if the statement at the top of the article is correct, it's not a copyvio to post it here -- but little things like creating derivative works, ie. editing, aren't allowed, so it's an incompatible license. In any case, I have my doubts about anything from a website that claims to offer Truth with a capital "T". --Carnildo 03:13, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, for all reasons above. --Trypa Party 03:59, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.