User talk:Zawersh

Welcome to my talk page!

Please post new messages at the bottom, using headlines when starting new topics.
I will usually reply on this page to messages posted here. If you would prefer I do otherwise, please say so.
I normally watchlist user talk pages for a few weeks after posting to them. If I have posted on your talk page, feel free to reply there.

Welcome to the Wikipedia[edit]

Welcome, newcomer!

Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience:

First, take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial, and perhaps dabble a bit in the test area.
When you have some free time, take a look at the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. They can come in very handy!
Remember to use a neutral point of view!
If you need any help, feel free to post a question at the Help Desk
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Also, here are some odds and ends that I find useful from time to time:

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page.

You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~~~~.

Best of luck, and have fun!

Clockwork Soul 14:35, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Bible citation[edit]

Thanks for the excellent work on re-pointing those links. I will continue adding the abbreviation redirects and will correct any affected by your change. Peter Hitchmough 07:59, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Disambiguation[edit]

Note — the linking method used for, e.g. Amos, needs attention. It might be best if the page Amos were the disambiguation page, and all links to Amos meaning Book of Amos were fixed. This can be done gradually over time. That would be the current use of disambiguation on the site. Peter Hitchmough

Looks good (splitting Amos into (prophet and book). Of course, if you split you need to look at its What links here [[Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Amos]] and edit the links. However I think there needs to be the following pages:

Amos — for disambiguation, replaces the current disamb. page.
Amos_(prophet)
Book_of_Amos

Anyway, thanks for discussing. Be bold, be wise. Peter. 08:30, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism inquiry[edit]

Hey, Zawersh, I was just wondering, I noticed that you corrected some vandalism on a page that I originally created and that I watch (historical thinking). How did you find this vandalism? It was a couple of characters appended onto the last reference on the page... I'm just curious to know how I can catch stuff like that. Andicat 2:40, 6 Feb 2005

Copyright Question[edit]

Fortune 1000 seems to be largely a data dump from [1]. I read over the various articles about copyright violations, but couldn't figure out whether it would be a violation to reproduce the full-scale data from a magazine like is done on that page. I tried finding a place where I could ask for someone to check on it, but it seems that the only way to do it is to blank the page and put up the copyvio notice, and I wasn't sure that that was appropriate since I really have no idea if it's a copyvio or not. I also tried figuring out where to ask more generally and finally got frustrated and decided to use the helpme tag -- sorry!! How should I approach this article/situation? Thank you! -- Zawersh 00:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure of a policy to handle it either, but taking it to the talk page is certianly the right next step. In fact it stumped a series of helpers hiding on #wikipedia-bootcamp. I think the question that should be asked there is exactly what you have asked above. Random brainstorm ideas; ask the magazine, ignore the issue and use it till they complain or read the magazines copyright. Sorry that i have no 'pat' anser, but you've done the usuall things I would do to anwser the question! -- ∞Dbroadwell 01:03, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I'm glad it wasn't just me being stumped on it. :) Thanks for the help, I think I figured out a tolerable solution to the situation now. Cheers! -- Zawersh 02:56, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

confidence interval[edit]

Your proposed confidence interval using z-scores was far too wide unless the sample size is 1. A 90% confidence interval for the mean of a normal distribution should contain nowhere near 90% of the data (in fact, in some cases, it should contain none of the data). Besides, you're not taking into account uncertainty that comes from estimation of the variance--that's what Student's t-distribution accomplishes. Michael Hardy 01:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Computer science[edit]

Hi! I noticed that you have just signed on as a participant in WikiProject Computer science, and wanted to welcome you aboard. Please stop by the project talk page to see what issues are currently being discussed by other project participants, and give your input. --Allan McInnes (talk) 23:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome! I look forward to contributing to the project. -- Zawersh 00:22, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

welcome to WikiProject Programming languages[edit]

I look forward to working with you. Ideogram 02:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise! I'm glad to see the project revived. – Zawersh 04:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stub sorting Barnstar[edit]

Greetings. There is a Barnstar for stub-sorting up for proposal here. If you'd like to participate in the discussion, we'd much appreciate it. Thanks, and have a great days. :) SynergeticMaggot 18:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fortune 1000[edit]

Is there some way somebody can "import" the complete 1997 list electronically? I could even do with a list of names to copy/paste, i dont need revenues, etc. I can only get a hold of 1997's Fortune 500, but i need the 1000....Dragonlord kfb 17:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COMPUTING Invitation[edit]

I have noticed that you are already a member of a related project and thought you might be interested in this wikiproject also and hence leaving this note ... - From the outreach dept

Please accept this invite to join the Computing WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to computers and computing.
Simply click here to accept! -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 06:33, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Integrated banner for WikiProject Computer science[edit]

I have made a proposal for a integrated banner for the project here . I invite you for your valuable comments in the discussion. You are receiving this note as you are a member of the project. Thanks -- Tinu Cherian - 12:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

kernel density estimator[edit]

You recently undid a revision I made to the kernel density estimator article. I think you should add h back to the denominator:

Consider the case where X is a continuous random variable. The probability that xi equals x is then zero, and f(x) needs to be estimated by averaging those xi that are in an interval around x, say x +/- h/2, where h is the width of the interval -

x - h/2 <= xi <= x + h/2

which can be rearranged as

1/h * (-1/2 <= (xi - x)/h <= 1/2)

You can see from this that there needs to be another h outside of the summation.

Refer to pp 7 - 10 of Nonparametric Econometrics by Adrian Pagan & Aman Ullah, everything is explained there.

Mr wadsworth (talk) 18:12, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, I had misunderstood your edit summary to mean something else, but looking at the edit history I can see that you were actually restoring the equation to what it had been prior to this revision. I apologize -- I'll revert it back. -- – Zawersh 20:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Zawersh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]