Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reveal Codes

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was REDIRECT. dbenbenn | talk 07:48, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Reveal_Codes[edit]

Delete. The information in this page is found in the WordPerfect page. Therefore, this page should have been merged. --BenWilson 04:14, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
- So what is your reason to request deletion rather than redirect? ~~(no vote yet)~~ Rossami (talk) 05:45, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I opine the need to leave a redirect exists when there may be other pages that point to the page in question. I did a intra-wiki Google search and found two pages that contain "reveal code;" WordPerfect and Corel_WordPerfect. Of these pages, the latter redirects to the former. Therefore, only one page WordPerfect links to the page in question. As there is only one page presently linking to the page in question, there appears to be no need for redirect.--BenWilson 06:25, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
- Additionally, the information presented in the page in question exists in WordPerfect. Therefore, since the information exists elsewhere, there is no need for this page.--BenWilson 06:25, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
Pointless branch, but an article title likely to be used. And at least it isn't a mis-spelling, a search-engineism, or simply ungrammatic like pope hat. There is nothing to merge, so Redirect to WordPerfect. Uncle G 16:22, 2005 Feb 6 (UTC)
Redirect to WordPerfect. Megan1967 01:07, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.