Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noodle Incident

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - should be merged - SimonP 18:25, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

Noodle Incident[edit]

not noteworthy.--Silversmith 23:11, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and cleanup. Relevant to the Calvin and Hobbes strip, but should be classified as a stub. Not sure about its relevance to other comic strips though. --Chanting Fox 23:06, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
As of now, Merge and redirect to Calvin and Hobbes. I might change my vote if it is significantly expanded later. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:23, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Zzyzx, whose name could be easier to type. Merge and redir unless rewritten and expanded. Meelar (talk) 00:13, May 4, 2005 (UTC)
Merge & redirect, especially since Watterson intentionally never described what the Noodle Incident was, so there's never going to be significant content. —Wahoofive (talk) 01:37, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Calvin and Hobbes. No hope of expansion, as all anyone knows about the noodle incident is that Calvin insists he didn't do it and no one can prove he did. --Angr/_comhrá 02:30, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Calvin and Hobbes. Wahoofive was correct. This may have been in more appearances than has Mirror Universe (Star Trek), but per WP:FICT, a topic with only a little verifiable ("no one can prove it!") information should be merged into an appropriate section of its parent article. Barno 03:04, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Calvin and Hobbes. Megan1967 05:44, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect. I knew that was what the title was talking about even before I read the votes and opened the article. - Lucky 6.9 03:29, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, NO redirect. I've read countless "collection" books of the strip and they only referred to this about three times in, what, the five-year run those books covered? Non-notable in the rest of the world, and probably not very notable in the Calvin and Hobbes world either. Master Thief Garrett 10:04, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.