Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How 94.9 Lite fm has changed in 2005 so far

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 11:43, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How 94.9 Lite fm has changed in 2005 so far[edit]

Does this article have a meaning in any way?? I don't think so, and anything that involves the station's history at any time since it began should be at the station's article WLTM (FM). Georgia guy 23:03, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merge any useful information and Delete. — Phil Welch 23:05, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree with below--content non-encyclopedic. — Phil Welch 23:38, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no merge I really don't think that schedule or personel changes at a local radio station merit an article, or indeed even merit a mention in an article. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:37, May 20, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Nothing notable. 23skidoo 01:08, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, notability not established. Megan1967 02:12, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nothing notable whatsoever. — JIP | Talk 06:41, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: C&P or drug crisis: original research. Geogre 12:32, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Single station changes in part of one year? It's below even trivial status. :) — RJH
Delete. Gibberish. Rick K 22:01, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
Delete; not notable. Antandrus (talk) 22:05, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.