Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digg (2)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 03:26, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

Digg[edit]

Promotional. Delete unless rewritten. Previously, the article received 6:3 vote in favour of deletion (discounting sockpuppets and anonymous votes). Could be marked for speedy deletion, but I prefered to err on the side of caution. - Mike Rosoft 16:18, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as recreation of deleted content. --Carnildo 23:53, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. This is the third incarnation of Digg that I have seen. Once when it was up for vfd and deleted, once when I put it up for speedy delete due to it's recreation, and now we have it again in it's third incarnation. --Randolph 01:19, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and protect the article page. Vegaswikian 06:13, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And the reason you want it deleted it what? -Danzik

Delete, redirect to Dig as possible misspelling, protect. R adiant _* 08:56, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.