Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom of Britannica

Kingdom of Britannica

was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was

Unverifiable vanity article for a fictional country whose existence is attested by a single website and this article. —No-One Jones ^(m) 19:02, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)

• Nonsense. Delete. RickK 19:19, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. llywrch 21:51, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Is this country anywhere near the island of Rand McNally? Gamaliel 21:55, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, before all the wars start on VfD again. I voted delete the last time this came up. I do so again. (Oh, yes, in Rand McNally the toilets flush the other way around.) Geogre 23:48, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, nonsense. Not even a micronation. Gazpacho 23:52, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete as worthless. It reminds me of those nuts who think Texas is still a country and maintain hundred-fifty-year-long listings of "presidents" and "officials" for it. Inky 01:29, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Web fiction. King James bears a striking resemblanse to Czar Nicholas II of Russia, and Prime Minister Baines appears to be the hitherto unknown identical twin of former Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating.--Gene_poole 01:40, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. NeoJustin 02:56, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Not just a micronation, but a fictional micronation? - David Gerard 12:23, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. --Nought 23:01, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.