User talk:CoolDude

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Not CoolDude)

I notice that you have deleted my earlier comments, I would encourage you to raise this issue with an admin. Yours, Mark Richards 21:55, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)


Hi there. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you like it here.

Mark Richards was not vandalizing your page. He was just editing it to conform to our usual style here on Wikipedia. That's how the wiki concept works - you submit something, and other people work to improve it.

You may want to read some of the how-tos and style guides before you continue. Also, please assume good faith on the part of other editors. They're just trying to help. You'll avoid conflicts that way. Isomorphic 22:01, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)


Dear sir- It's considered a Bad Thing to blank your user talk page. It makes you look like you're trying to hide/silence criticism... You may wish to avoid this activity in the future. Don't worry, and look at Wikipedia:Avoiding common mistakes. - Fennec 22:12, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)


Please calm down. You said you wanted an admin. That would be me. So please listen now that you've gotten what you wanted.

The edits Mark Richards made were not vandalism; he was just trying to improve the article. Nobody here is out to get you, but you have to understand that Suncrest, Washington is not your article. It is a Wikipedia article, meaning anyone has the right to edit it. Take a look at Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers for a basic explanation of how our community works.

Also, please understand that it is considered antisocial to wipe someone's comments from your talk page just because you don't want to listen . See Wikipedia:Talk page for the policies. If you blank this comment, I will revert it. Isomorphic 22:20, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)


Sir, have you looked at our page titled Welcome, newcomers? If so, have you looked at the "Tutorial Wing"? You may simply be unaware that Wikipedia has policies and guidelines. You should consider browsing through the Style and How-to Directory.

In particular, the information at Wikipedia:Find or fix a stub is at issue here. Please use the standard stub message. It makes everybody's lives easier.

Regarding your talk page-- It's probably a good idea to leave all messages for at least a week, whether or not you've read them, so that others can view them and respond to them. The talk page is not just for communicating with you. It's also for communicating about you. Please don't attempt to hamper communication about yourself... It can really get people upset. :)

Finally, your reversions to your pet article are excessive. As described in Wikipedia:How to revert a page to an earlier version, revert wars are considered harmful:

Never revert the same article more than three times in the same day.

Now, since we try not to bite the newcomers, people are being extremely kind and generous towards your violation (assuredly out of ignorance) of this policy. However, continued reversions of this nature are liable to get you banned, at least temporarily.

Your friend, Fennec 16:52, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)

You must want a perminent ban huh CoolDude?--207.69.139.155 19:31, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)


Dear Mr. Dude, please note that it is not acceptable to have a page on Wikipedia:Votes for Deletion to merely contain a #redirect to that page. Also, please leave the VfD message on the page as long as it is listed on Votes for Deletion. Someone will deal with the message when the discussion on VfD is over. Thank you for editing Wikipedia, and thank you for your concern in this matter. Fennec 19:45, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)


Dear Mr. Dude, with regards to your comments on Talk:Suncrest, Washington:

You will be banning till the day u die then, their are so many anonimus proxies in the world.

It is true that there are a large number of anonymous proxies in the world. Fortunately, most can be automatically blocked. And you are right- Wikipedia will probably always be blocking anonymous proxies- until the day I die, and long afterwards . The blocking of other vandalism attempts is a sad but necessary part of day-to-day operations. But please, do not attempt to circumvent bans. Doing so is contrary to Wikipedia policy, and is not friendly. If you attempt to follow our policies and guidelines everything will be all right, and we will all be happy. Please do not get upset, or do anything rash, or conduct vandalism. If you insist on becoming a problem user, you will be a trivial inconvenience easily dealt with via the "Rollback" and "Block" buttons, and you will accomplish nothing of value. This situation is suboptimal for both parties. - Fennec 19:56, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Any one want to make a $10 bet, I bet this page will be deleted by CoolDude sometime today.

CoolDude does not have the power to delete pages, only to blank them. Fennec 02:03, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)

You have a terrible sene on humor moving pages around. Tag, someone else can fix it like an andmin because they can move a page to another page that exists easier than a member like me.--Ryan524 09:12, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)

HEYYYYYYY thanks for fucking things around people who work 4 wiki are dickheads —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.107.129.210 (talk) 05:54, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]