Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Bria"
"Bria"[edit]
"Bria" was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete.
Self-described neologism. SWAdair | Talk 09:47, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- delete - article does not establish notability, nor does it say where this was proposed or who it was proposed by - rernst 14:59, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- delete - self-described "late 2004 neologism" - SimonP 18:53, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Nanologism ("Nanologism": A late 2004 word invented to refer to a neologism of extremely narrow scope and microscopic usage"). Geogre 19:29, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete both this and "Bia", there is a place for such proposals but not here. Note that the VfD notice has been removed once, which is probably why it's now been listed twice. Andrewa 20:13, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, con brio. if the contributor says it's a neologism that's good enough for me. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 02:10, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Does it matter that it is a neologism ? Does it matter that it is not in common use-yet. It is a contribution to solving the problem of how to sensitively describe the British Isles. One person has suggested it (i.e. me) and it should be discussed on its merits, not on its newness. (Brihan )
- The above comment by the IP who wrote the article who seems to also be User:Brihan. I've sent a welcome. Andrewa 20:05, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete this spam wrapped in a dicdef, someone has an agenda. Wyss 12:30, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.