User talk:MANOJTV

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Shri Madhvacharya[edit]

Hi, Thanks for your edit of Shri_Madhvacharya. But can you please address the concerns raised at Talk:Shri_Madhvacharya. pamri 14:34, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your edit. I have removed the redirect that happens at Madhavacharya, so you can add the removed information there if you want. If you don't have much information, you can add a brief article & insert {{india-bio-stub}}. To edit redirecting pages, just append &action=edit to the page's URL. pamri 11:33, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)

 ==Kannur==
I see that you have been editing kannur . Can we join hands and make it better?

sumalsn

HI,

Can you help me create a Infobox for the Kannur article? Jisha C J 08:46, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

hi,

Can you or some body else get a fact check done on the Perinthalmanna's history part of the article? Iam not quite sure about it, I have already started cleaning up the article. Jisha C J 11:03, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

HI,

About 2 weeks back I had asked for your help on Perinthalmanna article.. So can u get a fact check done on its history part? Iam not quite sure about it.

Cheers ! Jisha C J 08:19, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

hi, Thanx for the speedy reply. Its the same case with me I have never visited Kannur but was able to find ample resources on the web about Kannur. Any modification on the Perinthalmanna article to make it better is welcome Cheers!! Jisha C J 08:39, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hi,

I did take a look at the discussion page. As you may have read there, Iam not a native of that place and neither have I visited Perinthalmanna. So what I did was to wikify the article and make it more readble. But I would try to make it better. Any help would be welcome. Jisha C J 06:12, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thank you![edit]

Hi MANOJTV. Many thanks for spotting the vandalism on my user page and fixing it! CLW 08:09, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kannur Saliyas[edit]

Hi Manoj, Do you have any information about Saliya weavers of Kannur? I'm also searching for the material about right-hand(Balanga) and left-hand(Edaanga) groups and various Chirakkal kings. The Kasaragod Saliyas belong to left-hand(Edaanga) group. There are couple of folklores about this community that I want to investigate. I was just wondering whether you have any information or you know somebody who is authority on these people. Manjunatha (6 Sept 2005)

Thanks[edit]

Hi, thanks for correcting the mistake on Rahul Sankrityayan. And, nice to see your user page – the beach is Kovalam, an I right? --Bhadani 14:33, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Trichambaram Temple[edit]

Hi, I just noticed that you added the dates back to the utsavam sentence. Are you sure that it starts on March 6 th every year? I suppose temple festivals are decided upon after taking into account various things and the malayalam calender and so on. I had deleted the dates after asking the questions about the dates on the talk page of the article.

Jisha C J 08:41, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sanskritization[edit]

This word is seen by a section of scholars as a ploy and they claim that it is only used by revisionist historians who seek to lynch the minority castes who consider themselves forward, for discrimination assumed to have been committed by their ancestors.

Don't you think the above sentence is bit cryptic? Could you please rephrase it? Thanks.

Manjunatha (27 Apr 2006)

Apology[edit]

The deletion from the talk page of User_Talk:Alniko was accidental. Very Sorry for that. I was just fed up with the reverts that the user Alniko was making in some pages. And I was pasting the warning messages in his talk page, and the deletion of your message was not at all intentional. Hope you will take this in good spirit.

--Samaleks 07:24, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year![edit]

ചിങ്ങമാസം വന്നേ.....ഓണം ഇനി ദിവസങ്ങള്‍ മാത്രം അകലെ... ഈ കാത്തിരിപ്പിനും ഒരു സുഖം.....പുതുവല്‍സരാശംസകള്‍ നേരുന്നു....ഈ വര്‍ഷം സന്തോഷങ്ങളും ഐശ്വര്യങ്ങളും നിറഞ്ഞതായിരിക്കെട്ടെ എന്നാശംസിക്കുന്നു-- thunderboltz^{a.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK}14:45, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Onam greetings[edit]

Happy Onam!

Manjunatha (4 Sept 2006)

Belated Onam wishes. Jisha C J

Special congrats[edit]

Special congrats for creating the page of yukthivadi Nileena joseph 14:41, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Bpremanand2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bpremanand2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Gouldmismeasure.jpg[edit]

Hello, MANOJTV. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Gouldmismeasure.jpg) was found at the following location: User:MANOJTV. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 06:05, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bpremanand2.jpg[edit]

Hi. When you uploaded Image:Bpremanand2.jpg, you did not provide a copyright tag. In order for this image to be used at Wikipedia, you need to release it under a "free" license, such as the GFDL. (All Wikipedia articles are licensed under the GFDL.) If you would like to release the image under the GFDL, please replace the "untagged" message with {{GFDL-self}}. If you would like to release it into the public domain, please use {{PD-self}}. You can also see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#For image creators for some other choices. If you do not license the image, it will be deleted shortly. --BigDT 13:25, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Frontline1.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Frontline1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Frontline2.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Frontline2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Frontline3.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Frontline3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bpremanand1.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bpremanand1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 23:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Image:Gouldmismeasure.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Image:Gouldmismeasure.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Kathakali Vadyamelam.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kathakali Vadyamelam.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:06, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kangaroo word[edit]

Kangaroo word, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Kangaroo word satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kangaroo word and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Kangaroo word during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. SilkTork *SilkyTalk 13:24, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use images in userspace[edit]

I was checking usage of fair use images, and I noticed that you had two fair use images displayed on your userpage. Technically, we aren't supposed to do that (per WP:UP#NOT), even in understandable circumstances like these, so I edited your userpage to remove them from display. I tried to keep the general thrust of things the same as it was by splitting them off into direct links in an attached bulleted list, so that you still get "credit" for your good work. Please feel free to change that as you see fit, and apologies if I've given offense. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 16:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nialogo.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Nialogo.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Biopsy and Nature Cure[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Biopsy and Nature Cure, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Biopsy and Nature Cure is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Biopsy and Nature Cure, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Yukthimcjoseph.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Yukthimcjoseph.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Yukthirekha1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Yukthirekha1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Yukthivicharam.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Yukthivicharam.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Jonestown Carnage[edit]

A tag has been placed on The Jonestown Carnage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wildhartlivie (talk) 14:43, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Jonestown Carnage[edit]

I have nominated The Jonestown Carnage, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jonestown Carnage (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ScienceApologist (talk) 00:36, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jones carnage.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jones carnage.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!)} 01:42, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yukthivicharam[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Yukthivicharam, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unreferenced WP:N, tagged since 9/2007.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. THF (talk) 00:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yukthivicharam[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Yukthivicharam, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no assertion of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds (talk) 02:21, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Yukthivicharam[edit]

I have nominated Yukthivicharam, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yukthivicharam (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 03:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please translate Yukthivicharam into Malayalam[edit]

This article appears to be about to be deleted in English Wikipedia. However, an entry in ml.wikipedia may make sense.Ventifax (talk) 23:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Jackfruit1.JPG[edit]

File:Jackfruit1.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Young Jackfruit.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Young Jackfruit.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:48, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Narayana Guru.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Narayana Guru.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:41, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Cvkunhiraman.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cvkunhiraman.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Sahodaran.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Sahodaran.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:21, 16 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:21, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ravivarma2.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Ravivarma2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:J Edamaruku.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:J Edamaruku.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:50, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Give me suggestions[edit]

Hi,

Currently I am working on this template about Renaissance of Kerala. Could you pls provide me some suggestions (which articles should be included) on sections Background, Events & Leaders and Others on my talk page here User_talk:Rameez_pp?

Cheer (Rameez pp (talk) 12:53, 24 July 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:CoconutMandari.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:52, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hibiscus3.JPG missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Hibiscus3.JPG

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:CoconutMandari.JPG missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:CoconutMandari.JPG

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]