Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deaf Beats, The

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Deaf Beats, The[edit]

Looks rather non-notable to me...a sum total of 52 Google hits for the band name, some of which aren't even relevant, searching for "jacob kraft" "dead beats" gets a sum total of 2 results. And if kept, the article should definitely be renamed to either Deaf Beats or The Deaf Beats, whichever is correct -- Ferkelparade π 08:32, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  • Neither notable nor particularly verifiable. Delete. --Slowking Man 08:56, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not Notable. utcursch 09:09, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Just another band. - 81.70.91.207 09:48, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Sorry, anon's can't vote. But I agree. Delete. Alphax (talk) 04:19, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC)
      • Anons are allowed to vote on VFD and elsewhere. There is no policy that says that anons can't vote or that their votes don't count. Admins can, however, discount anon votes if there is strong evidence of bad faith. For the relevant policy see: Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators. Also, it is helpful to keep in mind that decisions are made in Wikipedia by "rough consensus". Voting takes place only to help determine whether such a consensus exists. Paul August ☎ 17:50, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Give it two months. tdb 12:31, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC) Note: anon vote with no other edits
  • Keep. I wrote this article, but I am not the one who deemed the band notable. Apparently it was added to the list of notable industrial artists in early May by a different user and was not challenged at that time. I was simply contributing the absent information. Xanny 12:51, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC) Note: anon vote with no other edits
  • Keep It should be preserved because, in fact, it refers not only to a particular band but a style of music as well pioneered by The Deaf Beats. Note: anon vote with no other edits
  • Keep. Take a decision only if participation on this poll exceeds 1.5% of active wikipedia population . (Active population are legitimate users that have cast at least one vote in the last 33 days). Keep this poll active for 14 days then archive it. If the participation threshold is bypassed, implement the best rated poll option regardless the percentage this first poll option got. If the poll decision is not a final delete decision, then whatever else the decision is it should be valid for 1 month then we should reconsider.Iasson 09:10, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. No red tape, just delete it. Xezbeth 09:19, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
  • keep. Not everything of value is online yet. Tranquilized 09:23, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC) Note: user has no other edits.
  • keep.it works for me, so "keep it that way"
  • Delete. Rather a lot of sockpuppets here, it seems. --Carnildo 09:44, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • delete No all music entry (though there is one for The Dead Beats), kill the sockpuppets. Dunc|☺ 12:13, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete -Ld | talk 19:02, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, they aren't on Amazon, my benchmark for authors and recording musicians. They aren't mentioned in any of the scanned books on the site, they aren't on a compilation album, They aren't worth it. -- user:zanimum
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Deaf_Beats,_The&oldid=1137773997"