Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HaraHara attack

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was REDIRECT. Done. Jinian 15:24, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

HaraHara attack

This article is about a 'move' in a game that doesn't even have its own article in Wikipedia. If the game article existed I would recommend merging. Evil Monkey∴Hello 06:40, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Fancruft. ugen64 06:42, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable, gamescruft. Megan1967 07:13, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, specific to one game, at most only deserves a brief mention in the Super (fighting games) article, which it already has. The actual specifics of how they are carried out belong in a game guide, not an encyclopedia. Average Earthman 08:57, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. It's not about 'a' move, it's about a whole class of moves. Kappa 10:26, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Fancruft. --Bucephalus 11:40, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, replace with redirect to Super (fighting games) which already contains the relevant info. Radiant_* 12:49, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Super (fighting games) as per Radiant. Dave the Red (talk) 18:08, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to the game. Mgm|^(talk) 18:56, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect gamecruft about a whole class of moves. Wikipedia is not a game guide. No non-duplicate content to merge. Barno 19:36, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect as per above comments. P Ingerson 19:56, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.