Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reverend Smoltz

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 00:10, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

Reverend Smoltz[edit]

Marked for speedy but isn't a candidate. Reason for deletion was given as "pure vanity" and I'm inclined to agree. — Gwalla | Talk 06:32, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Simple vanity -- can I have a page for my pseudonym, too? Chiacomo 13:48, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep You have one -- I clicked on your name and there it is: vanity. unsigned vote by 199.111.179.240 (talk · contribs)
- Comment: No, he has a user page. That's not the same as having an article about himself in the main article namespace. — Gwalla | Talk 01:35, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy, per above unsigned comment. -- BDAbramson ^thimk 23:55, 2005 May 12 (UTC)
- Comment: It doesn't seem to be the pseudonym of a Wikipedia user. — Gwalla | Talk 01:35, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:VAIN. R adiant _* 09:07, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.