Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of UK Independent Schools

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. —Korath (Talk) 17:18, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC)

List of UK Independent Schools[edit]

Another meaningless list of schools. Delete. Radiant! 08:54, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)

Keep. RHaworth 11:13, 2005 Feb 20 (UTC)
Keep Do you know what the word "meaningless" means? Wincoote 14:53, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep. *yawn*. James F. (talk) 15:54, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep - censure nominator - David Gerard 23:56, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Putting censorship on people who disagree with you goes against the very idea of Wikipedia. Radiant! 10:27, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
  - No, "censure", not "censor". You have made a number of VfD nominations that appear greatly inappropriate. James F. (talk) 10:55, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
    - I have made a far greater number that are very appropriate. If you read VfD history, you'll notice that I get a number of concurring votes on nearly all of my nominations, and that the majority of them gets deleted almost unanimously. You'll also notice that I listen to reasonable arguments and can be convinced to change my opinion. Radiant! 16:15, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
      - There is no excuse for "collateral damage", to use that vile euphamism for carelessness. James F. (talk) 13:17, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Useful list. --Andylkl 14:04, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
Keep and strongly support comments by David Gerard and James F.. Yet another deletioncruft VFD nomination.--Centauri 20:53, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete would be better as a category. DaveTheRed 23:35, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep Should be reformed to include the reason why the founder setup the school. User:Sibaz 03:22, 03 March 2005 (GMT)
Keep Useful Vanky 18:26, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I'm going to say delete actually, not because the information is totally useless, but because Wikipedia is plagued by half-baked lists their authors have no intention of completing. An article that consists solely of a permanently incomplete list is not really encyclopedic in my book. These pages are a relic of the pre-category era. All these schools could be put in a category that would do the same job as this page without having to be a totally exhaustive list - something this page will never be. — Trilobite (Talk) 12:57, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.