Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy hopkins

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:18, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Jeremy hopkins

No evidence of notability. --W(t) 02:48, 2005 May 21 (UTC)

• I think we're back to "lower case surname == vanity" again. Delete Chris talk back 03:06, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity Howabout1 03:08, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. I think you might be on to something to the "lower case surname = vanity" thing, but remember the article usually has to be anon-written to be crap. Harro5 03:57, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
  • I believe it's known sometimes as Geogre's Law, after the user who made the first public statement on it ;-) Chris talk back 04:27, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 04:36, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: Surprisingly, not as bad a failure of Geogre's Law as I expected. This is an ad for a guy doing gigs. I hope he has supportive audiences who throw money at his feet, but Wikipedia is not an advertising site. Geogre 02:51, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.