User talk:Sylvain Mielot

Hello, This is my talk page. If you have a message for me, this is the place to write it. Since I'm new here, don't hesitate to tell me what I'm not doing right.

Welcome!

Hello, Sylvain Mielot, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Deryck C. 09:47, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

Aircraft specs policy

Several weeks ago, you voted in the WikiProject Aircraft Specifications Survey. One of the results of the survey was that the specifications for the various aircraft articles will now be displayed using a template. Ericg and I have just finished developing that template; a lengthier bulletin can be found on the WT:Air talkpage. Naturally, we will need to begin a drive to update the aircraft articles. However, several topics in the survey did reach establish consensus, and they need to be resolved before we implement the template. It is crticial that we make some conclusion, so that updating of the specs can resume as soon as possible. You can take part in the discussions here. Thanks, Ingoolemo ^talk 06:00, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

AWB template conversion

Hi. Thanks for your help in converting aircraft articles to the template! Two suggestions:

1. You can update your AWB settings file from User:Emt147/AWBsettings. It now uses regular expressions for a much more automated conversion process and it doesn't cut out random words like "performance" out of the text anymore. Add that page to your watchlist -- I update the settings file quite often as I go along to fix weird behaviors, and having the most updated version would make your life much easier.
2. Please use the "Preview" function in AWB before saving your work -- one of the articles you converted was missing the closing }} and the specs were garbled.

Again thanks for all your help! This is a big endeavor and every little bit is hugely appreciated! - Emt147 ^Burninate! 03:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

WikiWings

The WikiWings on your user page are a thankyou for your help with template migration. Thanks again! - Emt147 ^Burninate! 19:40, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. Glad I can help. --Sylvain Mielot 04:33, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Aircraft infobox consensus

I started a discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft to reach consensus on whether we should adopt a summary infobox for the aircraft pages. Please voice your opinion! If adopted, I will add it to the AWB settings file. - Emt147 ^Burninate! 17:48, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

WP:Air

I saw that you removed yourself from the WP:Air participants list. I hope you will continue to contribute -- your help with AWB and other edits have been tremendously appreciated. Thank you! - Emt147 ^Burninate! 05:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Well, just for a few months I hope, I'm just busy right now, so not much time to dedicate to wikipedia. I'll probably do a few edits here and there in the next few weeks, but nothing significant. --Sylvain Mielot 00:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Super 530 / MICA

Hi, you got any tips for keeping the two apart? To me both missiles look exactly alike. (I'm the one that put in the wrong picture you changed). - Dammit 16:48, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

You have 2 ways: the size, the Super 530 is bigger than the MICA. From the images http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Mirage_2000c_1.jpg and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Mirage2000_10.jpg you can see that the MICA is about the same size as the Magic II on the outer pylons whereas the Super 530 is larger. Also the position on the aircraft: the Mirage 2000 carries only 2 Super 530 on its main wing pylons but can carry 4 MICAs on the fuselage pylons. --Sylvain Mielot 18:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

The FriedrichFiles 19:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, if you look at my geocities pages, you´ll see that there´s only information - no advertisements (except the proivider adds), when I add my shiplist to wikipedia i´ll do this direct, but i do not have the time to put the content from my geocites pages into wikipedia, maybe you can do this?

Image:MirageIII-schema.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MirageIII-schema.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 08:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Links to Videos of World War II Aircraft Deleted Oct 7

Hello Sylvain -- I was very surprised to hear from you that you believe the new external links I added to the World War II aircraft pages to be in violation of Wikipedia guidelines, which I read before posting the links.

The aircraft videos I linked to on my site are all free. There is no charge for viewing them, so they are not "advertisements." (Perhaps you assumed there is some sort of fee to view them -- there isn't.)

My website has been online since 1997 and has never charged a penny to more than 2,000,000 visitors from around the world. Two years ago, we started selling DVDs to pay for our rapidly increasing video bandwidth costs. (There are over 14 hours of free World War 2 aviation video on our site for 24 aircraft.) Otherwise, we would have had to limit our material severely or abandon the site altogether.

I did a random check of some of the other World War II web sites that were on the links pages I posted on. They also have advertising, I am sure for the same reason we do. 99.9% of the visitors to our website do not buy anything, they only watch the free videos. We have received the Britannica Internet Guide Award and were a Yahoo "Pick of the Week."

As for the relevance of our material to the places where I posted them, I can not imagine a more relevant link to a Wikipedia page on the Boeing B-17 than a direct link to a page that shows a 25 minute video on "How to Fly the B-17." For the same reason, I linked directly to the videos for the P-51, B-25, P-47, etoile, etoile. This resulted in posting direct links on pages for many aircraft in Wikipedia, but IMO, that is appropriate for an encyclopedia where the most direct route to information is preferred. This not SPAM.

I suggest you review our site http://zenoswarbirdvideos.com and reconsider. I would be happy to answer any questions you might have. I am still learning to communicate in Wikpedia. Please excuse any errors. Zeno Zeno303 (Talk)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Adforum screenshot.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Adforum screenshot.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NMajdan•talk 14:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Adforum logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Adforum logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 21:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Transall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BilCat (talk) 07:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC)