Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold Perey

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 00:33, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Arnold Perey

Vanity. Created by its subject, Arnold Perey. Userfy or delete. Jonathunder 14:47, 2005 Jun 2 (UTC)

• Userfy Wikibofh 14:52, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep published anthropologist. The article is NPOV enough to be kept. --Scimitar 15:42, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: Just about anybody with a Ph.D. has a few publications. It's tough to get out of grad school these days without a few articles under one's belt. I had two by graduation day in addition to my dissertation. Having/not having publications shouldn't be the only criterion for academic notability, otherwise most Ph.D.s would merit their own page. That said, I don't know enought about this particular field to assess the notability of Arnold Perey. Tobycat 04:57, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Comment; Perey appears to be more significant as a leader of the Aesthetic Realism movement than as an academic scholar in the field of anthropology. -Willmcw 05:25, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It's already on user:Arnold Perey. Clear vanity. CDThieme 19:32, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. No Account
• Keep, notable enough. I mean, if some guy who ended up 4th in local elections gets kept, this article should be kept too.  Grue  12:39, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Doesn't establish that the subject passes the average professor test. Does not actually appear in those Who's Who books, at least according to the Marquis Who's Who database I searched which includes 20 different Who's Who publications. Gamaliel 15:42, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• I screwed up and typed the name in wrong. My apologies. He's in there. The obvious vanity aspect still motivates me to vote weak delete, however. Gamaliel 16:00, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - Vanity article - IMHO, active contributors on Wikipedia should be clearly encyclopedic, any borderline ones shoudl be out. Trödel|talk 20:03, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, adequately NPOV, verifiable and significant. Kappa 21:00, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep NPOV, he's done new work, it is verifiable and should be included. [( User: Nildawn )]

  I hate to point this out since I had this done to me when I was new and voted on VfD (and I really thought it was totally unfair - but now I see the wisdom of it) - but this person had only two edits prior to this vote and both were related to the subject above on the Aesthetic Realism page here & here.

• Keep. Needs a little de-vanitizing (no "Dr." Perey), but is nowhere nearly as bad as most vanity articles. Notability is admittedly borderline but I see the academic work plus significant role in Aesthetic Realism. JamesMLane 21:09, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Userfy: to quote Talk:Arnold Perey: "This is my talk page." - Nunh-huh 00:35, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Userfy. Neither his academic career nor his role at the very small Aesthetic Realism Foundation seem sufficient. -Willmcw 00:49, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.