User talk:Redcountess

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.


You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

  • If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
  • You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
  • If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 22:14, 23 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Some good work! —Morven 19:21, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Image dispute[edit]

Please make yourself completely familiar with Image copyright tags before listing stuff as disputed. For your future reference album covers are fair use and use the {{Albumcover}} template. The disputed image list is already quite full of images placed there correctly, and does not need additional legitimate images listed to it also. Thanks! Alkivar 19:32, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

(Other comments deleted as duplicated on Talk:Keith Richards)

Stones[edit]

Thanks for your vote of confidence. BTW, what's your impression of the The Rolling Stones article? It feels pretty POV to me at the moment. It makes summary judgments of the quality of albums, for instance (until I changed it, it said that Goats Head Soup was only memorable for "Angie"...), and seems to take a pro-Brian Jones position whenever possible. I think it needs something of an overhaul. john k 20:31, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, the POV is a problem, but as I replied to your comment on the article's talk page, I didn't know too much about Brian Jones so I just decided to comment out the most contentious paragraph until refs were provided by the original contributor, and concentrate on copy editing the article, which in itself needed a lot of work. You might want to have a look at the Keith Richards article too. - redcountess 20:57, Jan 10, 2005 (UTC)

Mardi Gras Indians[edit]

Thanks for your edits to the Mardi Gras Indians article. I was wondering why you orphaned some of the images by removing some of those previously illustrating the article. Wondering, -- Infrogmation 01:12, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I was trying to improve the layout and flow of the article, so removed the link to one photo which I thought had the least impact. Feel free to put it back. redcountess 19:35, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)

Invitation[edit]

Hi, your areas of knowledge could be very welcome at WP:TIMET JennyLen☤ 18:07, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Queen Charlotte (by Ramsey).jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:22, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Queen Charlotte (by Ramsey).jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Queen Charlotte (by Ramsey).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Redcountess. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Redcountess. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Redcountess&oldid=1062296102"