User talk:Husker007

Inappropriate article

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We're glad to have you here. Just wanted to let you know--the article you recently created does not meet the guidelines established for Wikipedia articles and will be removed. Please use the sandbox for testing and your personal user page for your own use. Best wishes, and ask at Wikipedia:Help desk if you have any questions. Yours, Chessphoon

However humorous your article may be, it is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Consider adding it to your user page instead. Please stop adding nonsense to the Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Third and final warning

As a new Wikipedia, you likely aren't familiar with the Deletion policy. I encourage you to read it over. The deletion of articles is never a fun task, but please understand that if some people call an article you've written into question, they are not trying to attack you personally. Also, part of the deletion process is the use of deletion messages, put on candidate pages. If a page has a deletion message, that does not mean that it will definitely be deleted. It merely means that some Wikipedians aren't sure that it belongs in the Wikipedia. It is an invitation for you to defend the article's existence.

Removing deletion messages is heavily frowned upon. I realize that you may not be familiar with this, so I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. But please realize that it's considered extremely bad form to remove the message while a decision is in process. You have removed the deletion tag from Jim Fleckenstein four times. You have been warned once here on your talk page by Chesspoon and once on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jim Fleckenstein by myself. For the third and last time, please stop removing the tag. If the consensus on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion is to keep the article, the notice will be removed by an admin. Removing the message beforehand will not prevent the article from being considered for deletion.

If you remove the tag again then your actions will be reported as vandalism. The end result will likely be a 24-hour period in which you will be blocked from editing pages. Please do not make this necessary — simply leave the deletion message on the page for the time being. Instead, improve the article and defend it on the VfD discussion, keeping Wikiquette and civility in mind. Regards, • Benc • 05:52, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

controversial tags

Please follow the guidelines Wikipedia:List_of_controversial_issues#Boilerplate_text_warning. The tag goes in the discussion page, not the article itself. Dem Bones 08:34, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

These have been reverted and rolled back. Sjc 08:35, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I note you are still adding spurious tags. Please desist forthwith. Sjc 08:38, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Vandalism Removed

Husker007

Those pages contain porn, they are not spurious tags. They are needed to protect minors viewing this site. Porn is NOT appropriate! Husker007 08:39, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

No. They contain encyclopaedic information. I am proposing an immediate block on your vandalism forthwithSjc 08:42, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Those pages contain porn, they are not spurious tags. They are needed to protect minors viewing this site. Porn is NOT appropriate! Husker007 08:39, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Er, no. But please detail this in the talk pages and we will see whether we need to look at them. I suspect we do not. Sjc 08:48, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Human and other vandalisms.

Please stop with the vandalism, otherwise we will be forced to block you from editing. Theresa Knott (taketh no rest) 17:31, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Husker - I've been watching what is going on. Your edit warring has gone on long enough. If you continue, you will be blocked. Consider this your last warning. →Raul654 17:56, Sep 11, 2004 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Husker007

Hazing?

Trust me you are not being hazed. The community perception of you at the moment is that you are a vandal who is trolling. You are not behaving like a new user who is learning the ropes, and that is why people are suspicious of your motives. We see numerous new users join this wikipedia and as a rule they don't go around slapping warning notices all over the place or vandalize articles. I'm sorry if your experience of wikipedia so far has not been positive but that is largely your own doing. Theresa Knott (taketh no rest) 01:06, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)