Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine DeGregorio

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 20:57, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Christine DeGregorio

Non-notable professor. "Christine DeGregorio" gets only 90 unique Google hits, and I don't know how many people that covers. "Christine DeGregorio" +"Networks of Champions" gets 8 hits. amazon's ranking of it is 191,857. The title by the way, is "Networks of Champions : Leadership, Access, and Advocacy in the U.S. House of Representatives". The "Networks of Champions" title seems to be a series by different authors. RickK 07:46, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, although Networks of Champions is her own book, not part of a series, AFAIK. I hope she doesn't see this vote; I had a class with her last year. Meelar (talk) 18:20, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, published professor. Megan1967 06:22, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Every single person who has ever written a book should have an encyclopedia article? RickK 06:23, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
    • No, only if they are professors or notable academics. Megan1967 07:13, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
      • This article doesn't establish that she's notable. Even one of her students, above, doesn't think she's notable. RickK 21:19, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep — Semi-notable. — RJH 20:13, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. There are literally thousands of new books published a year by academics and many more journal articles. Heck, it is a "publish or perish" professsion. Virtually every professor is published at some point in his or her life or that person tends to no longer be a professor. Definately not a bar of notability when it probably weeds out less than 10% of the group. Indrian 13:47, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Not every published acedemic, professor or not, is notable enough for an encyclopedia article, but its hard to call. A listing on amazon doesn't mean anything, unless it is high ranking. Paradiso 03:34, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete As noted above, almost every academic publishes. As a comment, I don't think that the Amazon ranking is quite appropriate for evaluating the notability of academic work. Number of citations a work recieves would more accurate. Dsmdgold 01:36, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.