Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intel 80486DX

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus. —Xezbeth 19:31, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)

Intel 80486DX

Has some incorrect technical information, superseded by the full Intel 80486 entry. Should be deleted and the entry name redirected to Intel 80486 entry.

MSTCrow 00:15, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)

• merge anything useful, if it exists (note warning of incorrect info) and redirect. DDerby 01:41, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect as above. --Fuzzball! (talk) 04:06, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Merge anything useable to Intel 80486 and add redirect. Megan1967 06:10, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep alone, notable processor. Grue 18:47, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, cpucruft. ComCat 06:37, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Merge, it may be a notable processor but we already have Intel 80486 CAPS LOCK 00:21, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Merge, this is the Intel 40486 base model... Musser 00:23, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, There's also Intel 80486SX, Intel 80486SL etc. --Laura Scudder | Talk 01:00, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - as Per reason above --Irishpunktom\^talk 13:33, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge all Intel 80486 variations (this one, the SX, the SL, and any others) into one article. Keeping simple variations of a thing together avoids needless repetition and makes it easier for readers to get an immediate sense of the scope of a topic. -- 8^D ^gab 15:54, 2005 Apr 15 (UTC)
• Merge as per User:BD2412. --cesarb 17:37, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.