Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bible at Crosswalk

summarizes offerings of a for-profit web page Wolfman 19:41, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)

keep But it needs a lot of work. I say change it form VfD to "cleanup" and lets look at it again in a week. KeyStroke 19:43, 2004 Sep 24 (UTC)
Delete. Advertising. However, an article called Crosswalk.com may be appropriate, as the site has an Alexa rank of http://www.crosswalk.com/ 4,231. As long as it's not a feature list like this is. —Triskaideka 21:13, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. I don't care what Alexa says. --Improv 21:27, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete: Ad for a website. Geogre 21:41, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Wikipedia is not a web guide. — Gwalla | Talk 01:52, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Obviously, just an advertisement, a feature list. As a comparison, even if a business is notable, we wouldn't keep a supposed article which was almost entirely a bullet point list of the products and services they offered. And what happens if the Alexa rank falls? Not every website with an high Alexa rank lends itself to an encyclopedia article. Jallan 18:07, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete for reasons given above. Fire Star 21:42, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete Jayjg 04:43, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Ambi 09:20, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)