Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concept2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. --Michael Snow 05:49, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Concept2[edit]

Self-promotion / Advertising. Very little encyclopedic content. P0per 18:18, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

keep notable company who make ergometers (aka rowing machines). Let's not row over the hill on this one (a common mistake -- move the hands away over the knees before you start to come up the slide), seems fine to me. Dunc|☺ 19:40, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, extremely well-known in rowing circles, corporation of national significance. Decent article as well. Christopher Parham (talk) 19:43, 2005 May 23 (UTC)
Keep. Doesn't read as advertising to me. If you don't like it, clean it up. DoubleBlue (Talk) 20:03, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep please this should not be ereased Yuckfoo 20:22, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, feel this is a notable company (they have equipment in practially every gym and very well known in rowing circles) and deserves a page on wikipedia. If there are problems with the article (NPOV or advertising) I think this should be discussed on the talk page and the content changed accordingly. (NB - I originally wrote the article.) Johnteslade 21:17, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have used their rowing machines a lot, of course they should have an article. NSR 21:35, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article is in good shape. Well done Johnteslade. Capitalistroadster 00:35, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.