Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cumulus Tower Winnie

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 21:21, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Cumulus Tower Winnie

I can accept that towers in and of themselves are notable. But planned towers? I'm going to go out on a limb and say that if a tower hasn't been built yet, it doesn't deserve an article. BTW, there are over a dozen articles on planned towers at the List of masts page. Consider this VfD a test case for the rest of them. DaveTheRed 21:34, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• I'm of the opinion that if it isn't in the ground, or in the case of products available for purchase (unless a part of some long established franchise), then it shouldn't be in wikipedia. See wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Delete--nixie 22:09, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, concur with Nixie. Radiant! 08:32, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per nixie. Let's come back to it when it's actually built. Mgm|^(talk) 08:50, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.