Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transfrequency

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 02:40, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Transfrequency

Original research. Possibly speediable as patent nonsense. Delete. --BM 23:45, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete original research/deep thoughts. Gazpacho 01:07, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep Article doesn't make much sense, but then does the Orgone theory? Pseudosciences and other quackeries have their own pages, if anything to inform people how silly most of them are. It should be given a chance to be cleaned up, perhaps. --Hooloovoo 02:09, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Changing vote to Delete as nonsensical, I was too tired at 2am to think of the google test. --Hooloovoo 14:43, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Transfrequencey miserbly fails the google test [1]. Original resarch/non-notable. Dave the Red (talk) 04:14, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as nonsense. Radiant_* 08:47, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.