Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sangsaeng

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge with Jeung san do moink 17:24, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

Sangsaeng

I'm sorry, what? This makes no sense. RickK 00:03, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)

Appears to be a principle of Jeung san do, each of which has been spun out into its own article. Should probably be merged into the main article (which needs serious cleanup), except it may be a copyvio from [1]. Chris Johnson 02:50, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, article as it stands is not encyclopaedic, possible copyright violation. Megan1967 08:03, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. This article contains two quotations which also appear in the above website. That alone is not copyvio. SteveW | Talk 22:41, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • My mistake - the paragraph above has been slightly edited so it's not an exact copy. This article still contains more than that, however - the article wants cleaning up and this paragraph should be rewritten. SteveW | Talk 22:43, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• not sure what to do about it but it isnt really a copyvio Yuckfoo 16:34, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.