Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darwinian Happiness

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Stormie 09:19, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)

Darwinian Happiness[edit]

Original research, non-notable, originally posted by the author in what appears to be an attempt to self promote his book/concept. Concept not found anywhere outside his book. --JPotter 21:13, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)

Can we please decide whether to keep Bjorn Grinde, the book's author, first? If he's deleted, his book ought to be too; if he's kept, his book probably should be. Jason, I vote that you withdraw this nomination temporarily, and nominate the author's page first. dbenbenn | talk 00:16, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Done --JPotter 06:20, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)

~~Weak~~ Keep, cleanup and expand. Megan1967 03:04, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Agree to both points--ZayZayEM 14:14, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I've voted to keep the author, but that article has space enough to be expanded and this isn't one of the classics of science that deserve an article of its own. Merge, possibly trimmed (Wylliums version), with Bjorn Grinde, provided that article is kept. Otherwise userfy both. / up+land 17:25, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep Beta_M ^talk, |^contrib (Ë-Mail)
Keep. --Viriditas | Talk 19:49, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.