Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinclair Schuller

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 00:28, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Sinclair Schuller

This is clearly nonsens. I have googled and find nothing to support any of the content. The sinclair disambiguation page should also be edited demo 17:50, 2005 Mar 7 (UTC)

• Comment: This was apparently either never listed on vfd or removed out of process, so I'm bringing it to today's page for resolution. —Korath (Talk) 00:43, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Just silly. If anyone finds it funny, it could be moved to BJAODN. Mwanner 01:50, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 08:34, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• NN, and not even amusing enough for BJAODN, del BigFatDave 22:58, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Doesn't even appear to make sense. ebc29
• Delete, nonnotable, vanity, not funny enough for BJAODN. Wile E. Heresiarch 22:53, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.