User talk:Sending out an SOS
Hello. I removed your request from Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration as it was obviously premature; please try the other steps of dispute resolution first. Thanks. —No-One Jones (m) 04:11, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
And I moved it to User:RickK's talk page so he can see it. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 04:18, Oct 27, 2004 (UTC)
On my talk page, you wrote:
RickK blocked me illegally either serve the warrent or BAN ME!
- That's not the way it works. The arbitration committee is the court of last resort; the first resort, which I notice you haven't tried yet, is talking to the other parties in the dispute. Since you haven't even edited RickK's talk page, your request for arbitration is premature and will be removed as frivolous. —No-One Jones (m) 04:19, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- If you want help in pursuing your grievance, you might try looking at Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates. You could probably find someone to give you advice about Wikipedia procedures. Incessantly reverting on the Requests for Arbitration is unlikely to accomplish anything. JamesMLane 04:33, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Your request for assistance has been noted. We will work to help you in your grievance case. Wert
Larry Sanger[edit]
Why don't you start being civilized? Attacking anonymous users is not going to help the site. 63.230.158.214
Agreed--···---··· 03:53, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I did not attack anyone. I welcome anonymous users as editors of articles, but when there's a question of one person's testimony against another's and one is anonymous and the other identified, then I am inclined to disregard the anonymous one. That's what happened. That is not an "attack". Michael Hardy 18:38, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)