Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betty Brant
 | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
This page is an archive of the discussion surrounding the proposed deletion of the page entitled Betty Brant.
This page is kept as an historic record.
The result of the debate was to keep the article.
Rambling, juvenile, non-wiki nonsense supposedly about a character in the "Spider-Man" movies. - Lucky 6.9 16:17, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
- Proof positive that LSD and fan fiction definitely do not mix. Redirect to Spider-Man. Alcarillo 16:34, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
- FWIW, Betty Brant is a character in Spider-Man comics... she's the wife of Ned Leeds who becomes the Hobgoblin... there's not much else accurate about this, though, and rather than makign people change their votes, I'll just create a real article once this one is gone. Snowspinner 16:42, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
Probably should have been speedy deleted as nonsense. -- Cyrius|✎ 17:32, May 14, 2004 (UTC)- Can it be speedily deleted? That way, Snowspinner can start a new page with a fresh history and without this garbage lurking in the background. - Lucky 6.9 18:03, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
- Someone has now deleted the article, so I went ahead and put a real one in. Obviously, I vote to keep it, and I would like to note that votes for deletion prior to this comment were for a completely different article. Snowspinner 20:43, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
- I'd like to note for the record that I was the one who speedy deleted the original. As Snowspinner had already volunteered to rewrite, I didn't see it as being much different from rewriting in place. -- Cyrius|✎ 21:44, May 17, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep new version. Jgm 21:02, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
- Keep new version. 4 articles link to it, and it has been a requested article from Daily Bugle, at least, for quite some time. If this goes, there are other articles there that should probably go too. Niteowlneils 21:20, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
- Cool. Keep new version. - Lucky 6.9 21:33, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
- Keep new stub. -- Cyrius|✎ 23:03, May 14, 2004 (UTC)
- I concur. Keep.--Beelzebubs 00:00, 15 May 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue should be placed on other relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.