Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AmIAnnoying.com

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Korath (Talk) 15:48, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)

AmIAnnoying.com

non-notable wiki spam. Incorrectly listed on the 2nd by user:81.77.109.130, adding to the list today for comment--nixie 23:31, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. Somewhat notable. --Daniel C. Boyer 21:16, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, definitely notable - over 1,050,000 hits on Google, [1] . Megan1967 23:54, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, lots of google hits, and its the largest on-going celebrity poling site on the internet, according to the article at least. DaveTheRed 02:02, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable website, although the article should probably be renamed Am I Annoying.com or a redirect created if not one already. 23skidoo 14:28, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. A very notable website. Binadot 16:07, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Abstain, thanks for backing me up, as I thought the site was notable enough to be on wikipedia. I added a redirect so Am I Annoying.com directs to here. --Tubutler 19:24, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. At 37,980, I think this is the highest Alexa rank for a VfD article I've ever voted on. --Deathphoenix 06:54, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Borderline keep. Could do with third-party evidence of anyone caring - David Gerard 17:36, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Added third-party evidence of anyone caring :). Let me know if there's anything else I should add or delete. --Tubutler 18:56, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.