Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taxmen

Taxmen was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. 9 votes to delete. 2 uncounted votes to keep—one unsigned, the other signed "The Taxmen" by an anon user responsible for vandalizing this page to change votes. Postdlf 06:41, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Taxmen[edit]

Soon to be famous rock band. No album. --LeeHunter 18:51, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Let me tell you how it will be... ...delete. Dunc|☺ 19:05, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I hope they declare the pennies on their eyes. Delete. Geogre 00:18, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete - non-notable. Nadavspi 00:36, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete. A case of promotional campaign. --*drew 00:38, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete, even though everyone took all the good George Harrison jokes from me. Ah-ah, Mr. Wilson. Ian Pugh 01:44, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete, non-notable, POV, wikispam. Andre (talk) 14:00, Oct 19, 2004 (UTC)
Extreme non-notability plus blatant advertising equals Delete. --Neschek 19:48, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
With the new edits from our good friend Evercat, I feel this page no longer constitutes deletion, but rather is a perfectly valid overview of the band. ~The Taxmen.
- Delete. A good overview of a nonencyclopedic topic still doesn't belong here. --Improv 21:38, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
No potential to become encyclopedic at the moment, best of luck with the label and album however —siro χ o 10:13, Oct 21, 2004 (UTC)
Do not delete. Any topic which may be of interest to someone should have the right to be posted.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.