Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Denmeade

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 23:26, May 12, 2005 (UTC)

Samuel Denmeade

Doctor. 10 Google hits. Non-notable. --InShaneee 19:11, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Despite being an academic, it is not evident from the article he has made enough of an impact in his field to be notable. Deus Ex 21:43, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Google Scholar lists 117 citations for a paper by an SR Denmeade at John Hopkins (so likely to be the same person), with others with 55, 39 and 34. Average in medical science is about 5 [world average of 5.15]. So he's not utterly non-notable. Since the original creator was still expanding the article on the day it was listed on VfD, and this was only the day after it was originally created, I'd say an article on a doctor who has published at least one high-impact papers deserves a bit more time to see if the creator can expand further. Google also shows he is the named recipient in a number of research programmes funded by the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs and The Prostate Cancer Foundation. Give some time to expand - slap it on pages needing attention and see if the IP expands it more. Average Earthman 23:18, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Concur with Average Earthman. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 00:26, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, and expand. Some notability. Megan1967 01:59, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.