Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.i.d.S

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:00, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

A.i.d.S

I find this lack of music notability disturbing. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:12, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete not notable Dsmdgold 09:41, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, band/crew vanity. Megan1967 10:58, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• They are definitely notable (ignore the "underground" claim? - one of the two members is probably the most prominent and commercially successful rapper in Germany at this time; there are articles about both of them on de: de:Sido, de:B-Tight). However, this version is no big loss. expand or delete. regards, High on a tree 13:58, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup based on High on A Tree's comments. Bands with notable members qualify under WikiMusic Project guidelines. Capitalistroadster 08:51, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Sido has had three Top 40 hits in Germany so qualifies under Wikimusic guidelines under requiring at least one top 100 hit in a big or medium market.Capitalistroadster 09:07, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per above. Kappa 16:49, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unless someone expands the article to state why it's notable. Remember, VfD is about the article, not the subject. Chris 00:48, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.