Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiggly puff

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was BJAODN, delete, redirect to Jigglypuff. – ABCD 15:50, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Jiggly puff

Quite amusing nonsense, delete (and move to BJAODN).--Dmcdevit 04:11, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Not sure if this is BJAODN-worthy, but it did give me a chuckle. -- Riffsyphon1024 04:16, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)
  • Ah well... I guess the standards are higher now, but they'll keep trying--Dmcdevit 04:19, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Jigglypuff -- Cyrius|✎ 04:39, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Redir as per Cyrius. Meelar (talk) 06:00, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nonsense. Megan1967 06:31, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nn faminecruft. ComCat 01:57, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, original research. (Oh, and BJAODN) --Angr 10:40, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nonsensical216.40.21.106 12:22, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Jigglypuff --Aranae 18:36, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Jigglypuff Klonimus 12:00, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.