Talk:Duck Family Tree

From VfD:

Content is already covered in Donald Duck and Carl Barks. If some isn't, it can be added to those two articles. supadawg 22:01, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

• Keep, but needs major cleanup/expansion. Ideally, the article would need a graphical representation of the family tree, but I fear all available images are copyrighted -- Ferkelparade 22:07, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Addendum: It might be a step in the right direction if the article actually focussed on the intricacies of the Duck family tree as it can be reconstructed from the comics instead of rehashing information on Barks and Rosa that is covered elsewhere. I'd volunteer to rewrite the article, but it might be at least two weeks until I have sufficient time to do the necessary research -- Ferkelparade 22:17, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Sounds good. Thanks very much. supadawg 22:18, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Concur- this is something a researcher might actually want to look up for reference, and it is a bizarrely complicated family tree for very well-known characters. Clean & keep. -FZ 12:54, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)

• As others have said, keep and expand. Aris Katsaris 02:21, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
• Keep and expand, with careful distinctions between the animated cartoons and writing by Barks and Rosa. Jallan 23:03, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion