Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Fisher

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 01:31, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Daniel Fisher

• I think it's a hoax, I can find no reference to any production of "Seven Days in the Bathroom at the Place Milton" on Google, or any Daniel Fisher who is an actor. If not a hoax, it's vanity/non-notable. Delete--Dmcdevit 01:29, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep- I saw the play. You're right, he doesn't have a website. Matt Grant, Montreal
  • The above edit was from 65.92.16.24. This is this user's only edit. Mo0[talk] 09:32, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep it! It's real! I know. I saw it too. -Billie Stoeth
  • The above edit was from 66.131.214.192. This is this user's second edit. Mo0[talk] 09:32, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• I've seen it and it was one of the funniest things I have ever seen. The only thing funier was the Donkey Show - Shawn Guttman
  • The above edit was from 24.156.51.174. This is this user's only edit. Mo0[talk] 09:32, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. Mo0[talk] 09:28, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as vanity. Radiant_* 09:38, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Poor attempt by the author to save it, too. Phobophile 10:14, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 13:29, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• This is no hoax. Daniel Fisher is the real thing. He is a true artist and deserves the utmost respect and credit for his work. - Jenn Gans
• Hoax, O Sock? Give me a break. They never learn, do they? Delete. - Lucky 6.9 22:44, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, just because an artist isn't well known or written about on the web, doesn't invalidate his existence. Who are you to say that someone is vain, or so un-notable that they should not be written about in an open encyclopedia? Daniel deserves an entry. If you are fans of the dissemination of free information, the more the better, right?-Gil 17:57, 1 Apr 2005 (EST)
• Apparently, this person is well known for his performance with sockpuppets. Unfortunately, there is no effort to establish notability. For reference, we would be looking for evidence that this fellow is a notable comedian such as release of an album of his material, appearance on high profile TV shows, headlining tour etc. As yet, none has been produced so delete. Capitalistroadster 01:02, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• For the sake of the future of artistic culture in Montreal, this page must be kept up. Danny The Fisher is a rising star here and it won't be long until you'll be kicking yourselves for your doubting. -U.M.

• Keep, If Wikipedia wishes to retain any sort of credibility within the online, user-edited, encyclopedia world, it must retain this article. Daniel Fisher has left me speechless more than once, and his performances are irreplacable. Those of you who wish to delete the entry, I say only this: for shame. - Carly Ruderman

• Keep, I can't fathom why anyone would doubt Daniel Fisher's notability. - Jack Martin
  • I would and I have. Socks with attitudes. Sheesh. - Lucky 6.9 04:28, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Fisher's notability is primarily on a provincial level, although he has also performed in theatres in Toronto and Vancouver. I'm not surprised that Australians would not have heard of his work. But Just because he is not an inter-Continental superstar does not make him "Not Notable." I say keep. J. Charest

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.