Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integration of Internet Explorer and Windows

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Golbez 04:46, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Integration of Internet Explorer and Windows[edit]

Already covered by the Internet Explorer article; bad title; and no referrers. --minghong 21:18, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree fully. Mcfly85 22:40, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The title can be fixed, referrers can be added. The duplicated content, mostly covering the removal of IE, should be reduced to a summary on the actual IE page. AlistairMcMillan 00:08, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Then I guess an alternative name of "Removal of Internet Explorer", so as to inline with other seperate articles. --minghong 06:59, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - If this article doesn't get deleted, I was planning to add more detail about integration as it came up during the MS v DOJ trial. So I'd prefer it kept the "Integration" name. AlistairMcMillan 21:30, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, best as a separate topic, per AlistairMcMillan Kappa 01:32, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, cleanup and expand. Megan1967 07:00, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the page can be fixed and improved on, so as to help others who search for ways to remove IE from Windows. Jids 18:06, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Effectively a fork of Internet Explorer.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.